Unemployable Graduate
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Education
  • Economics
  • Public Policy
  • Workforce
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Unemployable Graduate
  • Home
  • Education
  • Economics
  • Public Policy
  • Workforce
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Unemployable Graduate
No Result
View All Result
Home Public Policy

What is government for? – Public Purpose

August 21, 2022
in Public Policy
0
What is government for? – Public Purpose
190
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


This morning, on the Fox News Channel’s Fox & Friends, personality Steve Doocy told viewers to get the coronavirus vaccine because it would “save your life” and noted that 99% of the people now dying from Covid-19 are unvaccinated. Brian Kilmeade answered that not getting the vaccine is a personal choice and that the government has no role in protecting the population. “That’s not their job. It’s not their job to protect anybody,” he said.

It is, of course, literally the job of the government to protect us. The preamble to the Constitution reads: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

But Kilmeade’s extraordinary comment cuts to the heart of the long history from the New Deal to the present.

In the 1930s, to combat the Great Depression, Democrats under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had offered a “new deal for the American people.” That New Deal meant that the government would no longer work simply to promote business, but would regulate business, provide a basic social safety net, and promote infrastructure. World War II accelerated the construction of that active government, and by the time it was over, Americans quite liked the new system.

After the war, Republican Dwight Eisenhower rejected the position of 1920s Republicans and embraced the active government. He explained that in the modern world, the government must protect people from disasters created by forces outside their control, and it must provide social services that would protect people from unemployment, old age, illness, accidents, unsafe food and drugs, homelessness, and disease.

He called his version of the New Deal “a middle way between untrammeled freedom of the individual and the demands of the welfare of the whole Nation.” One of his supporters explained that, “If a job has to be done to meet the needs of the people, and no one else can do it, then it is the proper function of the federal government.”

In this, Eisenhower and his team were echoing Abraham Lincoln, who thought about government at a time when elite southern enslavers insisted that government had no role to play in the country except in protecting property.

As a young man, Lincoln had watched his town of New Salem, Illinois, die because the settlers—hard workers, eager to make the town succeed—could not dredge the Sangamon River to promote trade by themselves. Lincoln later mused, “The legitimate object of government is ‘to do for the people what needs to be done, but which they can not, by individual effort, do at all, or do so well, for themselves.’…Making and maintaining roads, bridges, and the like; providing for the helpless young and afflicted; common schools; and disposing of deceased men’s property, are instances.”

So Eisenhower and his fellow Republicans were in line with traditional Republican values when they declared their support for an active government. But those who objected to what became known as the post–World War II liberal consensus rejected the idea that the government had any role to play in the economy or in social welfare.

In 1954, William F. Buckley, Jr., and his brother-in-law L. Brent Bozell, Jr., made no distinction between the liberal consensus and international communism when they defended Wisconsin Senator Joe McCarthy for his attacks on “communists” in the U.S. government. They insisted that the country was made up of “Liberals,” who were guiding the nation toward socialism, and “Conservatives,” like themselves, who were standing alone against the Democrats and Republicans who made up a majority of the country and liked the new business regulations, safety net, and infrastructure.

That reactionary mindset came to dominate the Republican Party after 1980, and now, forty years later, a television personality is taking the stand that the government has no role in protecting Americans against a worldwide pandemic that has killed more than 600,000 of us.

And yet, the idea that the government has a role to play in the economy remains popular, and this is creating a problem for Republicans. As soon as they took office, President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats passed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan without any Republican votes. About 60% of Americans liked the plan, and it is likely to be more popular still now that checks from the Child Tax Credit extended in it began hitting parents’ bank accounts on July 15. Even before that, at least 26 Republicans were touting the benefits of the measure to their constituents while neglecting to mention they voted against it.

Now, Congress is negotiating a two-part infrastructure plan. Biden and the Democrats have worked hard for three months to get at least 10 Republican senators to agree to a $579 billion measure that would provide hard infrastructure like roads, bridges, and broadband. Negotiators are still hammering out that agreement and Democrats are making concessions; yesterday, Ohio Senator Rob Portman, a Republican, told CNN that a provision to pay for the package in part by enforcing tax laws against those ignoring them bothered Republicans enough that negotiators cut it.

And yet tonight, leading Republicans said they would not vote to advance the bill on Wednesday, citing the fact it is not fully written. Since both parties regularly move their measures forward under such circumstances, many Democrats simply see this as a delaying tactic to try to kill the measure before Congress starts a month-long break on August 6. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has said for weeks that he would bring the bill up in mid-July.

If the bipartisan bill fails, the Democrats can simply fold the provisions in it into their larger infrastructure bill that they intend to pass through budget reconciliation, which cannot be blocked by a filibuster. This larger, $3.5 trillion measure includes funding for human infrastructure, such as childcare, and for addressing climate change. It also will move corporate taxation from the 21% established by the 2017 tax cut up to about 28%. (It was 35% before the 2017 tax cut.)

The Democrats need to get these measures through because they are facing serious financial deadlines. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 suspended the debt ceiling—the amount the country can borrow—only until July 31 of this year. And the budget needs to be hammered out by September 30. If it isn’t, government funding can be extended by a continuing resolution, but in the past, Republicans have sometimes chosen to shut down the government instead.

All of this will take place while the House select committee to investigate the January 6 insurrection will be holding hearings. Today, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) made it clear he intends to disrupt those hearings: three of the five people he named to the committee—Jim Banks (R-IN), Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Troy Nehls (R-TX)—voted to challenge the election results in Pennsylvania and Arizona, thus helping to legitimize the Big Lie that led to the insurrection.

McCarthy made Banks the ranking member, suggesting that he expects House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to reject Jordan, but there is already outcry at the idea of any of these three investigating events in which they participated. Already, Banks has indicated that he is not really interested in studying the events of January 6, saying tonight that Speaker Pelosi “created this committee solely to malign conservatives and to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda.”

McCarthy’s other two appointments are Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), and Rodney Davis (R-IL).

In today’s struggle over the nature of government, the Democrats are at a disadvantage. They want to use the government to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty, just as Lincoln and FDR and Eisenhower advocated. To drive their individualist vision, though, all the Republicans have to do is stop the Democrats.

—-

Notes:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/brian-kilmeade-says-its-not-governments-job-to-protect-anybody-from-covid

https://www.mediamatters.org/coronavirus-covid-19/defending-people-who-dont-want-get-vaccinated-brian-kilmeade-argues-its-not

https://news.yahoo.com/senator-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-loses-171317546.html

https://capaction.medium.com/25-and-counting-republicans-who-voted-no-but-took-the-dough-68fbf11df957

https://www.crfb.org/blogs/upcoming-congressional-fiscal-policy-deadlines

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/19/gop-infrastructure-deal-500166

​​https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/07/senate-democrats-unveil-reconciliation-progressive-aim-at-moderates/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/jim-jordan-four-other-republicans-chosen-by-house-minority-leader-kevin-mccarthy-to-serve-on-panel-investigating-jan-6-riots/2021/07/19/85c6b534-e8df-11eb-8950-d73b3e93ff7f_story.html



Source link

Related articles

The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

April 11, 2024
Never Worry about Home Security Again: Discover SFR’s Revolutionary Solution

Never Worry about Home Security Again: Discover SFR’s Revolutionary Solution

April 10, 2024
Share76Tweet48

Related Posts

The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

April 11, 2024
0

By Leah McCabe Women’s movements often play a crucial role in highlighting the problem of violence against women and girls...

Never Worry about Home Security Again: Discover SFR’s Revolutionary Solution

Never Worry about Home Security Again: Discover SFR’s Revolutionary Solution

April 10, 2024
0

Leading telecommunications company SFR has partnered with Europ Assistance to introduce a brand new self-monitoring offer, “Maison Sécurisée”. This innovative...

Public Knowledge Responds to MPA Chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin on Site-blocking

Public Knowledge Responds to MPA Chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin on Site-blocking

April 10, 2024
0

By Shiva StellaApril 9, 2024 Today, Motion Picture Association Chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin delivered remarks confirming the organization is...

Discover VerifEye, the App That Sees Through Your Lies

Discover VerifEye, the App That Sees Through Your Lies

April 9, 2024
0

Free app VerifEye, developed by Converus, purports to detect dishonesty with an impressive 80% success rate, already making waves in...

AI Gone Rogue: Sparks of War from Fake News

AI Gone Rogue: Sparks of War from Fake News

April 9, 2024
0

April 5, 2024, marked a significant incident in the realm of digital misinformation when a fake news story about an...

Load More
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Hilarious video explains principles of economics

Hilarious video explains principles of economics

August 21, 2022
HVAC Maintenance Checklist Templates: Download & Print for Free!

HVAC Maintenance Checklist Templates: Download & Print for Free!

May 18, 2023
Public Knowledge Responds to MPA Chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin on Site-blocking

Public Knowledge Responds to MPA Chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin on Site-blocking

April 10, 2024
Policy & Politics Journal Blog

Policy & Politics Journal Blog

August 14, 2022
Policy & Politics Journal Blog

Policy & Politics Journal Blog

0
Spotlighting interpretive approaches to public policy scholarship – Dr Tiffany Manuel on intersectionality – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

Spotlighting interpretive approaches to public policy scholarship – Dr Tiffany Manuel on intersectionality – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

0
Policy & Politics Highlights collection on policy and regulation August 2022 – October 2022 –free to access – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

Policy & Politics Highlights collection on policy and regulation August 2022 – October 2022 –free to access – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

0
Special issue blog series on Transformational Change through Public Policy. – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

Special issue blog series on Transformational Change through Public Policy. – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

0
Bernstein, The greatest 5 min. in music education

Bernstein, The greatest 5 min. in music education

April 11, 2024
The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

April 11, 2024
Economic Surprises Could Fuel Fed Deja Vu for the 2010s – The Wall Street Journal

Economic Surprises Could Fuel Fed Deja Vu for the 2010s – The Wall Street Journal

April 11, 2024
Building a Standout Employer Brand:Strategies for HR Teams

Building a Standout Employer Brand:Strategies for HR Teams

April 11, 2024

Recent News

Bernstein, The greatest 5 min. in music education

Bernstein, The greatest 5 min. in music education

April 11, 2024
The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

The policy impact of dissension within the Violence Against Women and Girls Movement – Policy & Politics Journal Blog

April 11, 2024

Categories

  • Economics
  • Education
  • Public Policy
  • Videos
  • Workforce

Newsletter

© 2022 All right reserved by unemployablegraduate.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Education
  • Economics
  • Public Policy
  • Workforce
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2022 All right reserved by unemployablegraduate.com

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT